Do you have a frame of reference? I am drawing blanks of anything longer within that time period. I can understand the periods that were far earlier, such as Plato and Aristotle, as writing was not as common. But during that period, it was far more commonplace. The emperor, Nero, was written about frequently by a multitude of sources, while he was alive and after he died
Lol. No obama was never respected. They all knew he was a spineless lead-from-behind kind of coward. Red line threats and all.
Paul wrote approximately 1/3 of the New Testament, so he is well qualified to comment on the holiness of scripture.
He IS everything.He didn't need to pull it from anywhere.
Yes, see the difference? We're joking when we say Camelot, Atlantis, Lost City of Gold etc. That's the difference. The joke factor.
I live in a suburb of Washington DC, and I NEVER lock my doors. Never have.
Well, "guaranteed livable income" and "guaranteed livable wage" are two different things, so maybe I just misunderstood you?
There wasn't a Nation at that time only his family, which was the beginnings, but he must have taught them. ?? ??
I believe that at the very least, the credentials, licenses and practices of ?conversion therapists? should be reviewed and potentially suspended or revoked in certain circumstances, just as professionals in other fields are subject to such review.
Still demonstratew how difficult it is to establish a guideline that we all agree on, isn't it?
I find more than enough hate almost everywhere I turn.
Yay! I'm old.
My spirit animal.
"I'm pretty sure all those long gone empires free of religion......"
If someone had to obey God rather than man, then we can talk about that then. But I fail to see what additional context this provides when we're talking about someone who had a way to follow both.
You are a fucking moron.
LMFAO. Your funny.
Canada didn't exist as a country until 1867, DUMBASS.
You're free to believe whatever you want. I'm not asking whether you believe in god, though, but whether you have proof that he's real, evidence that he exists.
Again inflation is a product of the Big Bang. It doesn?t create it.
What you just said was that scientists believe "knowledge" can be had by means other than empiricism. I have repeatedly pointed out that knowledge of things can only be had by the senses, and you elide that difference here. I have also pointed out that the test is the empirical component. Maybe you should my comments again. Or your own.
The Big Bang theory IS the natural explanation.
I mean she did a yelp review on her and it was pretty scathing
"Really? So it's liberals that want to build a wall and deport all the brown people?"